Ordinary rocks could power the next EV battery breakthrough

zohaibahd

Posts: 228   +5
Staff
In context: Electric vehicle sales are slowly picking up, but a significant roadblock is hindering even wider adoption – the limitations of today's lithium-ion batteries. They are expensive, and lithium is an environmentally unfriendly material in limited supply. While lithium iron phosphate batteries address some of the technology's disadvantages, a new breakthrough eliminates the need for lithium entirely.

Mohamad Khoshkalam, a researcher at the Technical University of Denmark (DTU), has developed a promising new material for solid-state batteries that could check all the boxes – capacity, safety, eco-friendliness, and low cost.

The material is primarily composed of elements found in rocks, specifically potassium and sodium silicates, which are some of the most abundant minerals in the Earth's crust. Additionally, it eliminates the need for expensive metals like cobalt, which are currently required for decent lithium-ion battery capacity and longevity.

This milky-white, paper-thin material serves as an excellent solid-state electrolyte layer inside a battery cell. Traditional lithium-ion batteries use liquid electrolytes that allow lithium ions to flow between the cathode and anode to generate a current. However, liquid electrolytes have downsides, such as potential leakage. Solid-state electrolytes are safer and can enhance performance.

Khoshkalam's electrolyte also conducts ions at around 40°C, which is close to room temperature. This means batteries using it could potentially be manufactured under normal conditions, rather than in expensive facilities that require highly controlled environments or extreme heat. Additionally, the material doesn't react negatively to moisture.

Transforming the electrolyte into a usable battery form is a multi-step process. Khoshkalam creates a potassium silicate powder, mixes it into a solution, and rolls it out into paper-thin layers. These layers are then molded into long, thin white tapes up to 10 meters in length and carefully dried. Finally, the tapes are moved to a special glove box environment to be assembled into complete solid-state battery cells with the anode and cathode components.

The potassium and sodium ions in these silicates are a bit larger and heavier than lithium ions, so they don't flow quite as easily. However, Khoshkalam has an undisclosed "recipe" to enhance their conductivity beyond what is typically achieved with lithium. His initial tests show strong performance for a solid-state electrolyte.

Of course, turning this material into real-world EV batteries will take time (or it may never even pass feasibility tests). The technology is still new compared to lithium-ion, which took over two decades to commercialize and continues to evolve. There are manufacturing scaling challenges, and new battery designs optimized for solid-state electrolytes will be needed.

Still, Khoshkalam's team aims to develop a demo battery within a couple of years to demonstrate the material's potential to companies. With silicate minerals covering 90 percent of the Earth, there is essentially an unlimited supply of cheap, eco-friendly battery ingredients waiting to be tapped. However, delivering on that promise without the hype fizzling out like so many previous attempts may prove to be the biggest hurdle.

Permalink to story:

 
To be honest, I'm sick of these claims I see everything through about batteries and cancer cure blah blah and see none of single of them, so either they are lies or don't work or the elite is hiding these for common people use as they hide other stuff form us.
 
One thing for sure, one day, there is going to be a replacement for Lithium-Ion batteries.
Absolutely.
To be honest, I'm sick of these claims I see everything through about batteries and cancer cure blah blah and see none of single of them, so either they are lies or don't work or the elite is hiding these for common people use as they hide other stuff form us.
So the world should just stop research then, to appease your sickness?
This is the nature of science and research and development. There is so much that is highly promising going on in battery research and development at this point that at least one will come to fruition in the not too distant future. Then you will no longer be sick. ;)
 
Absolutely.

So the world should just stop research then, to appease your sickness?
This is the nature of science and research and development. There is so much that is highly promising going on in battery research and development at this point that at least one will come to fruition in the not too distant future. Then you will no longer be sick. ;)
Where did I say they should stop the research? I just said we don't see these coming in the market. You need to have a checkup with a doctor for your sickness, not me.
 
To be honest, I'm sick of these claims I see everything through about batteries and cancer cure blah blah and see none of single of them, so either they are lies or don't work or the elite is hiding these for common people use as they hide other stuff form us.

The problem is generally scalability and commerciality. Unless you have a few billion plus to make the required infrastructure to mass produce, initially at a massive loss due to lack of customers, then you aren't reaching market.

Hence the argument that the Federal Government should take the most promising technologies and underwrite the costs for a few years, since there's a clear need for a better battery chemistry.
 
To be honest, I'm sick of these claims I see everything through about batteries and cancer cure blah blah and see none of single of them, so either they are lies or don't work or the elite is hiding these for common people use as they hide other stuff form us.
Don't pay attention to wiyo
 
Where did I say they should stop the research? I just said we don't see these coming in the market. You need to have a checkup with a doctor for your sickness, not me.
It takes about 3-5 years to go from lab to manufacture and then another 3-5 years to be commercially competitive against existing battery tech. You could have a Tesla model 3 with a 600 mile range but it'll cost more than a garage full of Bugattis.
 
To be honest, I'm sick of these claims I see everything through about batteries and cancer cure blah blah and see none of single of them, so either they are lies or don't work or the elite is hiding these for common people use as they hide other stuff form us.

It can feel that way , if someone you know is taken by cancer and all the headlines.
I remember headlines from long ago coffee, or black pepper causes cancer. Now they are considered good at fighting cancer.

Cancer is just a collective name. Some cancers have been "cured" ie had there death rate massively decreased.
Their are hundreds of types of cancer.
The first fight against cancer is detection, especially deadly ones like pancreatic, researchers are trying to get the gold std with simple urine/blood tests .

Before I blah blah blah, as most of us are male readers here. A colonoscopy is a great return on investment as bowel/colon cancer is a huge killer. I will get one later this year.

Using the same Tech as Covid 19 vaccine's some hot cancers can be cured for individuals , yes for rich as about $30 000 to sample cancer and create a personalised vaccine

As you battery tech , already billion dollar factories in place for lithium. So the theory is new tech needs to be x & better to overtake.
Plus many of lithium shortfalls are being addressed, eg stuff added to make them more stable, or other space added to increase capacity
Then you have other tech that may shoot up the ranks. Ammonium or hydrogen powered vehicles. That can be produced at place of very cheap energy farms and transported away.

Thankfully some of this tech made be great for huge local storage, with out say the downfalls of capacitors or lithium
 
There can be a lot of breakthroughs, but there will also be a lot of casualties because implementation may be too costly or not feasible. Rocks as battery for example, just adds a lot of weight to the car, which in turn requires more power requirement. With EV demand tapering off or even declining, most companies will just stick to the conventional to keep cost down.
 
Back