Infrared filter allows everyday eyeglasses to double as night vision lenses

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 44   +2
Staff
Something to look forward to: Night vision goggles have their uses but also many drawbacks, including their weight. A new development eliminates this cost-benefit analysis – in fact, it could revolutionize night vision technologies as we know them. Researchers have created an infrared filter that is thinner than a piece of cling wrap, weighs less than a gram, and can be placed over standard eyeglasses to allow the wearer to see in the dark.

Night vision technologies have a wide range of applications, from sports to military and medical operations. However, they are limited by bulky light-processing and cryogenic cooling components, as well as their reliance on narrow bandgap semiconductors, such as InGaAs, which require low-temperature operation and have high noise levels.

Additionally, these systems often block visible light. This gear can weigh more than two pounds, making it impractical and possibly unsafe to strap on a pair of goggles and go for a nighttime run.

Researchers in Australia have now discovered that using metasurface-based up-conversion technology – an ultra-thin material that can capture infrared and visible light at the same time – everyday eyewear can be augmented with night vision. They published their findings last month in Advanced Materials.

The researchers, from TMOS, the ARC Centre of Excellence for Transformative Meta-Optical Systems, created an infrared filter that is thinner than a piece of cling wrap, weighs less than a gram, and could one day be placed on an ordinary pair of glasses.

A look at traditional night vision technology underscores the complexity of this filter's task. Traditional night vision requires infrared photons to pass through a lens, encounter a photocathode that transforms these photons into electrons, which then pass through a microchannel plate to increase the number of electrons generated.

These electrons travel through a phosphor screen to be reconverted back into photons, producing an intensified visible image that can be seen by eye. These elements require cryogenic cooling to prevent thermal noise also from being intensified.

In contrast, with the metasurface-based upconversion technology, photons pass through a single resonant metasurface where they are mixed with a pump beam. The resonant metasurface enhances the energy of the photons, converting them into the visible light spectrum – no electron conversion needed. It also works at room temperature, eliminating the need for bulky and heavy cooling systems. Additionally, with up-conversion technology, imaging systems can capture both visible and non-visible light in one image.

The researchers' original technology featured a gallium arsenide metasurface. Their new metasurface is made from lithium niobate, which is fully transparent in the visible range, making it far more efficient. Additionally, the photon beam is spread over a wider surface area, limiting angular loss of data.

The researchers' first demonstration of high-resolution up-conversion imaging converted 1550 nm infrared light to visible 550 nm light in a non-local metasurface. They chose these wavelengths because 1550 nm infrared light is commonly used in telecommunications, and 550 nm is visible light to which human eyes are highly sensitive, according to study author Rocio Camacho Morales. "Future research will include expanding the range of wavelengths the device is sensitive to, aiming to obtain broadband IR imaging, as well as exploring image processing, including edge detection."

Permalink to story:

 
Since when do they need cryogenic cooling during use?
Cryogenic cooling would be used in conjunction with telescopes, such as Astrophotograpy. A fascinating career single handedly wiped out by Elon Musks STARLINK Satellite constellation system.
Yeah, I'm bummed. (An ex-Astrophotographer).

Buy hay, he brought us that weird truck most people can't afford & the one's who can, get to enjoy the hassle of yet another vehicle safety recall on that super awesome truck.
( I know, need to think happy thoughts...)
 
Cryogenic cooling would be used in conjunction with telescopes, such as Astrophotograpy. A fascinating career single handedly wiped out by Elon Musks STARLINK Satellite constellation system.
Yeah, I'm bummed. (An ex-Astrophotographer).

Buy hay, he brought us that weird truck most people can't afford & the one's who can, get to enjoy the hassle of yet another vehicle safety recall on that super awesome truck.
( I know, need to think happy thoughts...)
Rent free
 
Red torch headlamp.
Absolutely. Red light does not destroy night vision. If you go to star parties, most often, the only "torch lights" allowed must have red filters. Astronomers have known for a long, long time that red light does not destroy night vision.
 
Rent free
That would be the case, IMO, if the part about Starlink destroying astrophotography were not true.

There are those who want to excuse the God of Mars, and others engaged in similar businesses. LEO satellites might just destroy ground-based astronomy. For what benefit? More junk in space? Profit? Musk being able to bring his over-priced service to those who cannot afford internet access?

Before you say "space telescopes" there are many professional ground-based telescopes that exceed the capabilities of even the HST. The Keck Telescopes in Hawaii are only one example of such a ground-based telescope. Its a limited set of astronomical targets, based on wavelength of radiation emitted, that have to be viewed from space.

And BTW - ground-based telescopes are far cheaper to build, operate, and maintain than many space telescopes.
 
I wonder how big that pump light needs to be, or whether the pump light can be gleaned from the environment?

Lithium Niobate is a very common crystal used in lasers.
 
That would be the case, IMO, if the part about Starlink destroying astrophotography were not true.

There are those who want to excuse the God of Mars, and others engaged in similar businesses. LEO satellites might just destroy ground-based astronomy. For what benefit? More junk in space? Profit? Musk being able to bring his over-priced service to those who cannot afford internet access?

Before you say "space telescopes" there are many professional ground-based telescopes that exceed the capabilities of even the HST. The Keck Telescopes in Hawaii are only one example of such a ground-based telescope. Its a limited set of astronomical targets, based on wavelength of radiation emitted, that have to be viewed from space.

And BTW - ground-based telescopes are far cheaper to build, operate, and maintain than many space telescopes.
You're in the wrong thread.
 
Cryogenic cooling would be used in conjunction with telescopes, such as Astrophotograpy. A fascinating career single handedly wiped out by Elon Musks STARLINK ... Buy hay, he brought us that weird truck most people can't afford...
More venomous propaganda from someone upset Musk went off the plantation and exposed an illegal conspiracy between Twitter and the federal government. There were over 8,200 satellites in orbit as of 2022, with more than 1,400 being launched per year. Nearly 40% aren't communications satellites (earth observation, military purposes, etc), and fully half are dead or defunct. Starlink's satellites deorbit themselves when they go offline, at least, and proving a low-latency global communications network is certainly far more beneficial to mankind than providing targeting data to nuclear cruise missiles.

And even as you disdain the Cybertruck, I'll bet five years ago you were filling forums with demands the people immediately switch to EVs, to "save the earth".

there are many professional ground-based telescopes that exceed the capabilities of even the HST. The Keck Telescopes in Hawaii are only one example of such a ground-based telescope. Its a limited set of astronomical targets, based on wavelength of radiation emitted, that have to be viewed from space.
A few years ago, space-based astronomy was yielding research papers at more than a 2:1 rate to ground-based observation. And what you mean to say is that there are many astronomical targets that can't be seen at all from the earth's surface, and those which can are seen only poorly. Even when we apply adaptive optics, there's still the fact that much of the light is simply absorbed by the atmosphere. Also, earth's gravity distorts large mirrors, yielding a maximum practical size that can be reached. The future of astronomy is clearly in space.

Soon, optical instruments will begin being linked into large arrays similar to what we've long done in radio astronomy. When we link radio telescopes on both sides of the planet, we get a instrument with an effective aperture the size of the entire earth. If we do this with optical telescopes scattered along earth's orbit, we can create a telescope with effective aperture the size of earth's orbit (150M km). With such an instrument, we'd get meter-level resolution on objects in other star systems, enabling us to directly image human-sized objects and features on the surface of exoplanets.
 
Last edited:
Any demonstration images captured? Just put the film over some camera lens right? I'm surprised neither this nor the linked articles have any.
 
For some reason I had no clue that this song by Judas Priest was a cover.

"The Green Manalishi (With the Two Prong Crown)" is a song written by Peter Green and recorded by Fleetwood Mac.
Yep. A lot of youngsters think it's a Judas Priest song but the Great Peter Green RIP and the original Fleetwood Mac did this in about 1970.
 
1969 perspective here, I'm finally comfortable with my hair turning white. Yet I still can't find a keyboard to outlast 6 months without the characters on the keys being rubbed off clean.
So, hows that for a random trippy thought?
I'd prefer white hair to bald with an ugly head, perspective :)
 
Back