California Governor supports new measures to restrict smartphone use during school hours

midian182

Posts: 9,944   +128
Staff member
A hot potato: California looks set to implement a statewide ban on the use of smartphones by students during school hours. Governor Gavin Newsom said he is supporting the restriction on the same day that the Los Angeles public school board voted to ban student phone usage on campuses during school hours.

Newsom said he wants to build on legislation he signed in 2019 that gave California school districts the authority to limit or ban smartphone use during the school day, with some exceptions for extenuating circumstances.

In his statement, Newsom cited the recent calls by the US Surgeon General for social media platforms to carry health warning labels similar to those on cigarettes and alcohol. Dr. Vivek Murthy has called on Congress to apply labels to the sites and apps that alert users to the potential mental health harms they cause.

As noted by CBS News, the California School Boards Association said any regulations over student smartphone use should be left up to school districts, not the state.

"We support legislation which empowers school leaders to make policy decisions at a local level that reflect their community's concerns and what's necessary to support their students," spokesperson Troy Flint said.

Newsom's statement was released on the same day that the Los Angeles Unified School District, the second-largest in the county, voted to ban cellphone and social media use in its schools. The policy will be implemented in January next year.

Two LA board members voted against the ban. One told The New York Times that he voted against it as teachers are already facing difficulties in enforcing restrictions in schools. He also mentioned the main reason why there has been pushback against this sort of ban: the prospect of parents not being able to contact their children in the event of a school shooting.

New York Governor Kathy Hochul said in May that she intends to launch a bill that will allow kids to only use dumb phones, rather than those with full internet access, while on school property. The devices lack internet access but can send texts and make calls, which sounds like feature, or dumb, phones.

More states are pursuing phone bans in schools. Last year, Florida became the first state to require all its public schools to bar students from using their handsets during class. In April, Indiana passed a law requiring school districts to adopt policies banning students from having wireless devices during class time. Kentucky, Vermont, Tennessee, and Kansas are considering similar laws.

What are your feelings on schools banning smartphones? Is it needed, or does it pose an unnecessary risk to students? Let us known in the comments below.

Permalink to story:

 
When unable to figure out how a device can be used for education, it's a great idea to ban it outright instead of trying to incorporate it into children's education.

How about... instead of banning them... we take this opportunity to teach children how to use their devices (which they're going to have anyways - either in school, or before/after school) responsibly?

Pretty much every adult in the world has a smartphone now - and SO many of them use it like complete fools... wouldn't it be a good idea to DO something about this?

Alas, politicians don't think of long-term benefits... they think of the short-term as that's what gets them votes.
 
I would let them have phones, just not smart phones with internet or chat capabilities .... that seems to be the source of the distraction .....
 
Parents should just buy kids dumbphones, still allows parents to have communication with their kids, kids can still text friends and whatnot(the old t9 way), big positive is those phones cant handle any kind of apps so no social media to terrorize them.
 
And dumbphones don't cost an arm and a leg and the batteries last ages before needing a recharge. A phone as a communications tool doesn't need to have the functionality of a desktop computer for everyone.
 
How about... instead of banning them... we take this opportunity to teach children how to use their [devices] responsibly?
You "use your phone responsibly" in school by putting it away, and paying attention to the teacher. Glad you agree with the proposals here.
 
You "use your phone responsibly" in school by putting it away, and paying attention to the teacher. Glad you agree with the proposals here.
Depending on the lesson, you might actually need your device… a creative (aka “good”) teacher finds opportunities for students to use the device they are going to use anyways for productive purposes.

I teach STEM at my elementary school and we often use our devices for lessons.
 
Since they all have access to chatgpt you could just turn up the difficult of the lesson, it's like the introduction of the calculator, it doesn't have to be a bad thing.
 
Depending on the lesson, you might actually need your device… a creative (aka “good”) teacher finds opportunities for students to use the device they are going to use anyways for productive purposes.

I teach STEM at my elementary school and we often use our devices for lessons.
I always thought kids were supposed to be able to demonstrate their knowledge without relying on a pocket supercomputer? a calc(or whatever tool is required) and sheets of paper should be good.

I graduated in 06 so wow times have really changed helpwise with whats available, I mean theyre called "smartphones", seems like a massive crutch in some ways.
 
I always thought kids were supposed to be able to demonstrate their knowledge without relying on a pocket supercomputer? a calc(or whatever tool is required) and sheets of paper should be good.
Lots of people think that way... however, most of them don't understand what future ADULTS will need to know. As virtually every adult ALREADY has a smartphone, it goes without saying that the adults of the future will also have access to them.
Instead of pretending they don't exist, maybe we should teach children how to use them?
I graduated in 06 so wow times have really changed helpwise with whats available, I mean theyre called "smartphones", seems like a massive crutch in some ways.
As times tend to change quickly, it becomes difficult for previous generations to deal with current ones. The students we have in elementary (and secondary) schools now have no memories of a time where we didn't have smartphones, tablets, streaming, etc... our education systems SHOULD be keeping up with the times... it's hard, but if you want engaged students, it's the way to go.
 
Lots of people think that way... however, most of them don't understand what future ADULTS will need to know. As virtually every adult ALREADY has a smartphone, it goes without saying that the adults of the future will also have access to them.
Instead of pretending they don't exist, maybe we should teach children how to use them?

As times tend to change quickly, it becomes difficult for previous generations to deal with current ones. The students we have in elementary (and secondary) schools now have no memories of a time where we didn't have smartphones, tablets, streaming, etc... our education systems SHOULD be keeping up with the times... it's hard, but if you want engaged students, it's the way to go.
well thats the thing, im not against phones or any kind of tech really, I have a an $1100 phone in my pocket right now and a pc at home that crushes whatever I toss at it.

But, I also believe a person should be able to explain the hows or whys of how they got to an answer, as a technician myself I'm glad if someone can fix something yet I also sometimes want to know "why" they fixed it that way, does that person truly know the reasons behind the work? or are they just going through the motions and may hit a brick wall when a real doozy of a problem shows up in the future.

phones are built to be easy to use, massive companies want one in everyones hands so theyll do their best to make them accessible, all im saying is that if I had to choose between 2 people for a teammate I would go with the one who can work even when the wi-fi goes out.
 
well thats the thing, im not against phones or any kind of tech really, I have a an $1100 phone in my pocket right now and a pc at home that crushes whatever I toss at it.

But, I also believe a person should be able to explain the hows or whys of how they got to an answer, as a technician myself I'm glad if someone can fix something yet I also sometimes want to know "why" they fixed it that way, does that person truly know the reasons behind the work? or are they just going through the motions and may hit a brick wall when a real doozy of a problem shows up in the future.

phones are built to be easy to use, massive companies want one in everyones hands so theyll do their best to make them accessible, all im saying is that if I had to choose between 2 people for a teammate I would go with the one who can work even when the wi-fi goes out.
There’s no reason why this can’t be taught AS WELL.
There is a time and place for everything - it is the teacher’s job to educate the students - they can learn when and how to use a smartphone along with “regular” skills.
 
Back