HP CEO: The number of printed pages is down, hybrid work is killing the print industry

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 1,175   +341
Staff
A hot potato: You can add the print industry to the growing list of economies the hybrid work model is supposedly destroying with employees' help. HP's boss laments the sad state of affairs and proposes a subscription-based future as a possible alternative to the looming print apocalypse.

While talking to investors during Bernstein's 40th Annual Strategic Decision Conference a few days ago, HP CEO Enrique Lores said that the number of pages being printed at home, in the office, or in SOHO environments is lower than it was before the pandemic. Users are now printing 20 percent fewer pages, which poses a significant challenge to HP's printing business.

The number of printed pages has "clearly" gone down, Lores said, and the main culprit is apparently the hybrid work phenomenon. Fewer people are roaming offices every day, and the number of pages coming out of (HP) printers has gone down accordingly.

Paper must be considered as a "proxy" signal, Lores said, because what happens with pages eventually happens with devices. HP's estimations before the pandemic were about a 20 percent reduction of printing-related activities, and the current numbers are more or less in line with the company's predictions.

During the pandemic years, people were seemingly busy printing way more pages than they were before. After this temporary spike, the number of printed pages started to decline again. It's nothing unexpected, but one of HP's main businesses is still about selling printers and related, costly supplies to customers and enterprise organizations.

Previously published research by IDC stated that 450 billion fewer pages were being printed in both home and office environments in 2020. This 19 percent decline simply accelerated a long-term trend, and the growing popularity of hybrid work is now poised to deliver the final blow to the once-flourishing industry.

HP also noticed that while the number of printed pages and hardware sales are declining, customers are using their printing devices for longer periods of time. The company is still "trying to quantify" this trend, Lores said, while it is working to extract more value from its most loyal (or tolerating) customers.

HP is the company mostly known for forcing users to purchase its proprietary cartridges over cheap third-party alternatives, with angry customers fighting back with a class action. The corporation recently launched an "all-in-one" subscription offer to provide printers and ink cartridges for a monthly fee, and Lores said that the overall number of subscribers is now amounting to more than 13 million customers.

Permalink to story:

 
Printing will hopefully be a thing of the past... it kills me when I see 3 copies of a form that could have easily been sent (and filled out) online. Or full-colour glossy flyers left in my mailbox that inevitably get recycled with barely a glance...

STOP PRINTING STUFF!!
 
HP’s printing side of the business deserves to fail. Anytime someone prints something at my work, we laugh because it’s always a Gen Xer doing it. Boomers love to print out Craigslist ads or website order confirmations 😂
 
Printing will hopefully be a thing of the past... it kills me when I see 3 copies of a form that could have easily been sent (and filled out) online. Or full-colour glossy flyers left in my mailbox that inevitably get recycled with barely a glance...

STOP PRINTING STUFF!!
I was at a client the other day, noticed this particular guy who has his own office, was regularly coming out, printing, then scanning...

Went and had a chat with him, he was printing out documents, then scanning them to himself, to then send them on. Why? Because he didn't know how to convert a word document to a PDF...

Showing him that you can simply "save as" a PDF absolutely blew his mind, he's been doing it like this for years...
 
Last edited:
Anti-consumer design philosophy tends to have that effect... and it's not even the cost of ink toner that is the biggest issue:

- Planned obsolescence/anti-repair (consumables that cannot be replaced/maintained easily such as printheads, fusers, paper rollers etc.)
- "Consumable exclusivity" (having the same cartridge rebranded by physical keying or electronically, or unnecessarily updating a cartridge's form-factor just to sell a new cartridge)
- Gated functionality (settings and features unnecessarily accessible only through in-house apps)

It's nigh impossible to feel bad for HP when they are the -worst- offenders of D: all of the above, especially in regards to the home user and home office/small business equipment.
 
The joke is that if HP actually sold printers, instead of ink, having each printer used 20% less often wouldn't hurt them financially at all.

They thought they were so smart.
 
I've been in the copier/printer/fax/computer business, tech wise, since 1981. In the mid 80's, friends told me with the passage of the paperwork reduction act, I should find another job. I said yeah, whatever. EVERYTIME the government comes out with a new rule (and we know they do it 3,402,340 times a year!) our click volumes go up.
Heck, I have one client, that prints wide format labor posters. Every year, he has to print new ones for his clients because of government regulations. In four years, he printed in linear feet, enough paper to stretch 350 miles.
And our schools, even with chrome books (which we sell to them as well), their print clicks have gone up since the end of the lock downs.
 
They dug their own grave and no one will weep a tear. They build their printers to self destruct and their ink cartridges dry up faster than an air wick plugin. That company is on par to producing more waste than a coal power plant. Maybe they should lobby for paper ballots instead of producing garbage.
 
Maybe a chance for small to medium business to be able to enter the markets with demands lower than these mega corps want them to be. Tech was exciting when there was many companies pushing ideas and limits.
 
What else would you expect from a company that, like many other others, makes printers that can only use their proprietary, uber-expensive cartridges, which will disable not only printing but scanning & faxing unless you use them...

I remember when I discovered the "print to pdf" option like 20+ years ago. I was like "why didn't somebody think of this before ?"

BEFORE we were going thru an average of 1732.67 sheets of paper AND >$600 of ink per person per day.....

I guess that's why my storage needs have ballooned so much over the years since, because I can't really remember the last time I actually printed anything....

But I'd much rather give my money to a storage drive maker (no, not those silly online ones either) than HP any day :)
 
HP printers suck. That is, they suck money out of your pocket with all-too-frequent purchase of ink cartridges and a scheme that renders them "expired" even though there is plenty of ink. And, of course, 3rd part cartridges do not work. Maybe HP's downturn in the sale of printers is related to their predatory scheme to sell you ink cartridges. Their printers are made of cheap plastic that breaks easily, too. Makes me weep for poor HP! They deserve the downturn.
 
Back