IoT devices could become 40% more energy-efficient with this AI-based approach

zohaibahd

Posts: 228   +5
Staff
How it works: Backscattering allows devices to modulate and reflect incoming wireless signals back to the transmitter, similar to how RFID chips and contactless payment cards work by harvesting energy from the reader. This enables IoT devices to achieve battery-free communication.

Now, a team of researchers from South Korea's Pusan National University has developed a new method around the same technology that is approximately 40 percent more energy-efficient than current techniques.

Backscattering as a concept isn't new. However, the team's innovation lies in using AI to optimize the system and make it significantly more efficient for low-power applications like IoT sensors. Their approach involves using machine learning to precisely model the optimal "reflection coefficients" that determine how much of the wireless signal gets reflected.

Traditionally, calculating these coefficients has relied on simulations that don't perfectly match real-world conditions, making it challenging to achieve low bit error rates and high data rates. That said, the researchers overcame this by employing a technique called "transfer learning," where an AI model is first trained on one task and then refined using data from the actual target task.

To make it work, they pre-trained an artificial neural network on simulated input voltages to understand the behavior of the modulation circuitry under different voltage conditions. Then, they further trained that pre-trained model using real experimental data, allowing it to accurately predict the reflection coefficients for their specific hardware.

With these finely-tuned AI models, the team could optimize their 4-QAM and 16-QAM modulation schemes for maximum efficiency. QAM stands for Quadrature Amplitude Modulation, a scheme used extensively in Wi-Fi communication systems. Their resulting prototype system consumes less than 0.6 milliwatts during transmission – a fraction of the power required for conventional wireless radios.

The system also incorporates a 2x2 MIMO antenna setup to improve signal reception. When tested in the 5.7-5.8 GHz range, it achieved a spectral efficiency of 2 bits/second/hertz using 4-QAM modulation.

"The combination of accurate circuit modeling, advanced modulation techniques, and polarization diversity, all tested in over-the-air environments, presents a holistic approach to tackling the challenges in ISC and IoT," said Professor Sangkil Kim, who led the study.

According to the Pusan researchers, this lays the groundwork for reliable, ultra-low-power backscatter systems with potential applications in consumer electronics, healthcare monitoring, smart urban infrastructure, environmental sensing, and radar communication.

Their findings have been published in a paper in the IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

Permalink to story:

 
I like the hard science here.

This is machine learning, but not artificial intelligence.

"You keep using this word... I do not think it means what you think it means."
 
As I see it, without an increase in security, an increase in energy efficiency does not make IoT devices any better.
You see it wrong. Don't conflate entirely different concepts. Devices that last 40% longer on a battery charge are quite valuable, and when that efficiency is gained through transmitting at lower power levels, it also means less radio interference between these devices and others.
 
You see it wrong. Don't conflate entirely different concepts. Devices that last 40% longer on a battery charge are quite valuable, and when that efficiency is gained through transmitting at lower power levels, it also means less radio interference between these devices and others.
And you appear to be completely incapable of seeing the other side of the story that IoT is useless when it exposes your home network to its inadequate security measures.

I'd expect nothing less from you, so feel free to keep up your BS "you are wrong" comments.

Do you ever take responsibility for your own comments, you know, with statements like "I disagree" or similar? Or do you simply place responsibility for your opinions on everyone else.

Then again, as I said, I expect nothing less from you - especially given your origin.
 
And you appear to be completely incapable of seeing the other side of the story that IoT is useless when it exposes your home network to its inadequate security measures....I'd expect nothing less from you, so feel free to keep up your BS "...I expect nothing less from you - especially given your origin.
In your fervent rush to make a personal attack, you forget several critical facts:

1. Home usage is but a tiny part of the entire IoT ecosphere -- industrial and environmental monitoring are two major sectors. It is in these often remote, often unattended locations that greater energy efficiency is crucial. Please explain why you believe an IoT device in the middle of the Sahara, measuring rainfall, or one tagged to a Great White shark in the North Atlantic is "exposing your home network".

2. Not all IoT devices are insecure, and, even those that are, are not wholly "useless". These devices, being both new and with more limited processing and memory constraints are very reminiscent of early routers, which were plagued with security holes. Were those routers "useless"?

3. Had you read the article rather than simply jumping on the headline, you'd have realized this innovation has applications well beyond IoT devices. It applies, in fact, to any device or system reliant on Backcom (backscatter communications).

I'm sorry you find having incorrect remarks exposed as such so upsetting. Might I suggest a deep breath or two, followed by attempting to address the substance of my remarks, rather than veiled racist remarks about my heritage?
 
Last edited:
Back